Mullah, military and the masses - M Ismail Khan
When I read this in the paper the other day, I immediately thought about posting it here on Take Back Pakistan.. so here it is..
As the lawyers’ protest against the removal of the chief justice continues to hyperboles into mass agitation seeking change of government, the debate, has once again moved to the very basic question of who should run the country and how it should be run.
In a normal country and under normal circumstances people would prefer familiar difficulties to the possible benefit of the unknown. They would rather try to solve problems within the existing framework than confront a new system and new chain of command. But in Pakistan’s political history this proclivity has been challenged over and over again. During the last nearly sixty years, the country has had civilian rule for exactly half of its life. The frequency of change of civilian set ups has been much faster than the period involving transition from military to civilian governments, which has averaged a healthy ten years cycle.
How can one diagnose this prolonged crisis of the state? It is indeed easy to jump on words like ‘feudalism’, ‘institutional failure’, ‘colonial mindset’, ‘army’ etc but then which country does not have a ruling elite? Where do institutions, sometimes big monopolies, not fail? Which country is devoid of any historical legacy and of strong armies? It is not just institutions that fail, it is the failing relationship between institutions which cause failures. Read more »
Sphere: Related Content
By Ashfaq Ahmed, Gulf News Staff Reporter